Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nathan Ponwith vs Aidan Mchugh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ponwith vs Mchugh analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathan Ponwith vs Aidan Mchugh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ponwith 2 - 0 Mchugh
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ponwith has won 50.68% of points on their second serve, while Mchugh has won 56.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ponwith, in recent form, has won 50.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mchugh has won 49.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.93% and 31.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ponwith has saved 55.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mchugh has saved 58.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ponwith has won 30.77% of matches played (W/L 16/ 36), with Mchugh winning 59.72% (W/L 43/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 38/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Mchugh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 161/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 31% (W/L 4/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 6/ 24), where as Mchugh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.92% of matches (W/L 35/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ponwith winning 2 times and Mchugh being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Ponwith winning 4 and Mchugh winning 0. The last match between Ponwith and Mchugh was at the M25 Pensacola, 16-05-2024, Second, Clay with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ponwith and Mchugh have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ponwith winning 0 times and Mchugh 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ponwith winning 0, and Mchugh 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ponwith has played against opponents with an average rank of 180.37 while Mchugh has played against players with an average rank of 185.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ponwith has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mchugh has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ponwith has converted 41.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mchugh has converted 42.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
752
Rank
367
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
352
Rank
298
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
56% (170-136)
Career Total W/L
60% (248-166)
44% (11-14)
YTD W/L
48% (13-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$32,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nathan Ponwith | Aidan Mchugh |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:0 | 1:46:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (58/111) | 67% (72/107) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (39/58) | 51% (37/72) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (28/53) | 34% (12/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 79% (11/14) | 75% (6/8) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (58/107) | 40% (44/111) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Aidan Mchugh
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Aidan Mchugh
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nathan Ponwith | Aidan Mchugh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (11/14) | 48% (13/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (24/32) | 49% (29/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (246/276) | 51% (283/275) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (9/9) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 47% (7/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 60 | 81 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 98 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:50 | 1:47:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 222.48 | 236.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (985/1719) | 69% (1162/1686) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (637/985) | 67% (775/1162) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (372/734) | 57% (297/524) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (62/150) | 42% (69/164) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (647/1658) | 38% (676/1759) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 33% (4/8) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (9/9) | 60% (9/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (11/25) | 48% (13/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 40% (4/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 8% (13/1) |
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Nathan Ponwith
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Collin Altamirano
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Harsh Parikh
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Aidan Mchugh
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Maxwell Benson
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Aidan Mchugh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Aidan Mchugh
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Unknown Player
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Aidan Mchugh
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Elijah Strode
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Oliver Anderson
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Daniel Vishnick
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
100%
(
10 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
48
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Aidan Mchugh
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
79%
(
30 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Ryan Seggerman
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ponwith Vs Mchugh Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
